Two Ahmadinejads For the Price of One

WHY SETTLE FOR ONE MAHMOUD AHMADINEJAD when you can have two? A political movement-met-street theater in New York this week with not one, but two impersonators of the Iranian president.

The two “presidents” satirized the Iranian leader as part of Iran180, a campaign advocating for the Iranian government to do “a 180″ on human rights and nuclear policy.

The group’s been staging street events and protest theater as a way to say “yes to human rights, no to nuclear rights.” Here’s a video of the group’s protest outside the Iranian U.N. Mission in New York on February 14th:

Meanwhile, clashes between pro-democracy demonstrators and government continue in Tehran.

Reckoning With Torture: Exposing The War on Terror

reckoningwithtorture.org

THE WORDS AND IMAGES no longer shock us as they did back in 2004, but the legacy of America’s “war on terror” in Afghanistan and Iraq is still with us: tangible evidence and proof, in the form of declassified documents, that exposed the government’s post-9/11 torture program.

That record is the substance of a staged reading by the ACLU and PEN, “Reckoning with Torture: Memos and Testimonies from the War on Terror.” Reckoning features artists and writers like Art Spiegelman, Eve Ensler, and Paul Auster reading FBI memos, CIA documents, and autopsy reports.

The ACLU and PEN hosted a staged reading of “Reckoning” at the Sundance Film Festival last week. More staged readings around the U.S. are planned, and the ACLU has partnered with director Doug Liman to film a documentary. It’s part of an ACLU effort to urge accountability for the officials who authorized torture.

Hearing the actual words of government officials and bodies, even with parts redacted and censored, is riveting and chilling. It’s one thing to read about these actions and events, and quite another to experience the power of words. If you haven’t already heard the reading, you can watch a video of the entire program at PEN’s official website.

An Anthem for Arab Freedom

I LOVE THE LIFE OF FREEDOM (Aheb Eisht Al Hurriyeh) is an anthem for Arab freedom composed in the 1930s by Egyptian poet-laureate Ahmed Shawqi and musician Mohammed Abdel Wahab. Now this song is once again revived in the aftermath of the democratic protests in Egypt.

A video (in familiar Bob Dylan-Subterranean Homesick Blues-style) created by Stephan Said shows the musician-activist with a notebook and the lyrics in simple script while the song plays. Said released the video “to be used freely by all those who are working to build the international movement for a more just society,” and invites viewers to create your own audio and video remix.

Watch the video here:

The Worst Corporation in the World

IT’S NOT QUITE A ‘SHADOW’ DAVOS, but the Public Eye Awards, organized by two NGOs, the Berne Declaration and Greenpeace, use the attention directed at the annual World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos to name and shame the very companies attending the high-level conference.

The Public Eye Awards choose the worst corporation in the world, with two “winners” coming from a list of nominees chosen by the NGOs and voted on by the public. On January 28, Public Eye presented the award during an event held in Davos. And the “winner” is:

AngloGold Ashanti, a South African mining company for polluting rivers and water sources in Ghana.

And in the online poll, the public chose Neste Oil, a Finnish biofuel company that is the biggest buyer of palm oil for fuel manufacturing. Demand for palm oil destroys rainforests. Here is Neste’s response.

The Public Eye Awards call out environmental and social “sins” committed by corporations. In recent years they’ve singled out Roche, Citigroup, Novartis, Disney, and Wal-Mart.

The founders of the group want corporations to be legally accountable, and to observe and practice social and environmental responsibility.

Hear what Andreas Missbach, head of the Berne Declaration, has to say about being an agitator and activist at Davos.

Big Business: An Ally for Human Rights?

Image: carboncatalog.org

WHAT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF CORPORATIONS TO UPHOLD HUMAN RIGHTS? Considering the well-documented abuses committed by oil, gas, and mining companies, concern for human rights are not exactly at the forefront of corporate practice.

The phrase “corporate social responsibility” has not prevented labor issues, environmental concerns and displacement of indigenous peoples, to name a few abuses.

In recent years there’s been a growing discussion for corporations to respect all human rights. There’s a clear need to establish a standard for all companies to follow. That’s where proposed guidelines called “Protect, Respect and Remedy” come in.

Will these new guidelines transform big business into an ally for human rights?

This framework, released in November, was drawn up by Harvard Professor John Ruggie, the UN special representative for business and human rights. Many businesses and governments are reportedly on board with the guidelines, but some rights groups objected, saying the framework doesn’t go far enough.

Rights groups including Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch criticized the guidelines because they don’t require companies to respect human rights by law.

The guidelines encourage companies to take a voluntary approach to human rights. Which begs the question: without the rule of law to force businesses to comply, what incentive do they have to follow the framework?

The fact that we’re talking about business and human rights at the corporate and governmental level is a good start. But that’s only one part of the conversation.

It’s easy to blame capitalism and demonize “big, bad business”—however, as shareholders, and as customers of retail companies and services, it’s also up to the consumer to be informed and aware of what’s behind their purchases.

Can we do more to help advance human rights and business?

Learn more

Read the “Protect, Respect and Remedy’’ Framework (Business & Human Rights Resource Centre)

John Ruggie’s response to criticism from rights groups

Listen to an interview with John Ruggie from BBC Business Daily

What To Do Now To End Human Trafficking

Image: polarisproject.org

HUMAN TRAFFICKING IS THE FASTEST-GROWING ILLEGAL INDUSTRY in the world. The internet is increasingly a tool for traffickers to enslave people into sexual servitude or forced labor. It’s not a problem happening “somewhere else”, but all around us.

Advocates are stepping up awareness programs and advising us what to do now to end human trafficking.

It’s happening right now, in your community

Human trafficking is a global problem: according to the UN, more than 12 million people live in modern day slavery.

In the United States, human trafficking is on the rise in nearly every community. In Massachusetts, Attorney General Martha Coakley is a part of a coalition proposing new legislation to make human trafficking a crime. Massachusetts is one of five U.S. states without such a law.

Last week federal authorities from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement said Atlanta is emerging as a hub for human trafficking.

There are similar news stories for any region in the world. And since human trafficking is an “invisible” crime, it’s present everywhere but not always evident.

Sex trafficking at the Super Bowl

Take for example, the most-hyped event in sports, the Super Bowl: it’s “one of the biggest human trafficking events in the United States,” said Texas attorney general Greg Abbott, announcing plans to stop traffickers at this year’s game. Officials are well aware of the rise in trafficking in a Super Bowl host city, as was the case in Miami last year.

Learn More and Take Action

Visit Human Trafficking.org for updates and ways to help

Ask the Super Bowl Committee to Stand Up and Protect Children from change.org.

Learn more about the awareness campaign “I’m Not Buying It” to end human trafficking.

Why You Should Read Hessel’s Indignez Vous

indignez-vous-stephane-hessel-book-cover IT’S A NUMBER ONE BESTSELLER IN FRANCE, a pamphlet really, but its size belies the enormous ideas within: Indignez-Vous, by Stéphane Hessel, 93, French resister, is a call to action—but that’s only one reason why you should read Hessel’s book.

Hessel’s makes a direct appeal to all of us, but especially to the new, interconnected generation.

He shows the connection between a rising feeling of indignation against injustice—the feeling of ‘this is enough, this must stop’—and the commitment inside one’s heart to act and change.

You’re perhaps familiar with Howard Beale’s “I’m mad as hell and I’m not going to take this anymore!” cry of outrage from the film Network. While that was a fictional story commenting on a cynical, rapacious media industry, Hessel’s message to get up, cry out, and then act is the same.

In that moment of indignation lies the key to using our voices to create positive, social change.

“Look around you, you will find topics that justify your indignation…you will find concrete situations that lead you to strong citizen action.”

Hessel wants a nonviolent, peaceful insurrection; his words are hopeful but his vision is uncompromising.

If you meet somebody who does not benefit from the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, feel sorry for them, but help them win their rights.

He directly addresses the comfortable indifference that grips all of us. He writes:

It is necessary to get involved in the name of one’s responsibility as a human being.

How will we respond to Stéphane Hessel’s call to action?

Read an unofficial [non-Google-Translate] translation of Indignez Vous in English.

Self-Immolation As The Ultimate Political Protest

IT IS USED TO PROTEST WARS, TO CALL ATTENTION TO ABUSE AND INJUSTICE—self-immolation, the burning of one’s own body, may be a desperate act to some, though it is also seen as the ultimate political protest. Self-immolation is credited with galvanizing popular uprisings, as in the case of Mohamed Bouazizi in Tunisia this month.

Now there is news of more self-immolations spreading through the Arab World, with three reported attempts this week. And the practice is not limited to North Africa: two Romanians attempted self-immolation to protest homelessness and poverty.

What does this all mean? In an interview with NPR, Michael Biggs, a sociologist at Oxford University, says a person’s willingness to kill themselves is a powerful public statement, and “the injustice they’re suffering should be taken seriously.”

Related articles:

This piece from Thought Catalog looks back at the photo of Mahayana Buddhist monk Thích Quảng Đức, In Terrifying Color: Vietnamese Buddhist Monk’s 1963 Self-Immolation

Americans who self-immolated as anti-war protest

Afghanistan: When Women Set Themselves on Fire

Sudan: What Lies Ahead For Women?

Image: © http://sswen.org/

SUDAN’S REFERENDUM THIS MONTH IS PARTICULARLY IMPORTANT FOR WOMEN: they make up about 65 percent of the population in South Sudan, but lack the necessary political representation necessary to stop violence, discrimination and abuse.

Many women voting in Sudan last week are eager for separation, seeing in an independent South Sudan the opportunity for greater freedom and rights.

But progress towards that goal may be harder than ever. In December, over 60 Sudanese women’s rights activists were arrested for protesting the lashing of a woman by police. (The video of the flogging was widely reported).

How you can help:

Stand with Sudanese women at Women for Women International.

Related articles and reports:
The SIHA Network (The Strategic Initiative for Women in the Horn of Africa) is an advocate and supporter of women’s organizations. Read their reports on Sudanese women and democracy.

Open Democracy’s piece explores The Sudan referendum and women’s citizenship.

Reel Politics: The Films of Jean-Gabriel Périot

JEAN-GABRIEL PÉRIOT IS AN AGITAGOR: his short films confront and comment on current politics, historical events like WWII and Hiroshima, and socio-economic issues, including unemployment and gay rights.

While not exactly documentaries, the films use archival footage and images from the news. Périot edits the images together to create a story-montage, but it’s still up to the viewer to draw her own conclusions about the ultimate meaning.

Despite this, Périot’s voice and intent comes through clearly: he wants a reaction from the viewer.

His latest work, “The Barbarians,” (2010), begins with a slow montage of photo-op portraits of world leaders and other public figures, the kind of static images we’re used to seeing after a summit or conference. One image replaces the other, then adding in another layer to include ordinary citizens, shots from weddings and school events. It speeds up until you can’t quite keep up with each image.

Eventually the images slow down, to reveal the individual, in action, striking against society and its structures: police, buildings, vehicles.

The questions arise: how do I feel about the demonstators? What is the connection between the group and the individual?

Watch all Périot’s short films at his official website.

Here is an article about the exhibition of Periot’s work currently on view in Jakarta.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 109 other followers